Ohio on record pace as execution "killing field."
68Mark Brown
On February 4th, 2010, Ohio plans to execute Mark Brown, 37, a condemned man on Death Row for the fatal shooting of Isam Salman in 1994 during a robbery. Isam Salman was the owner of Midway Market in Youngstown Ohio. Brown received a life sentence for killing Hayder Al-Turk, a clerk, the same night.
Brown asked for a reprieve, which was denied, not because he doesn't wish to be executed but because he wants to challenge Ohio's new lethal injection technique. After the botched execution of Romell Broom back in September of 09, Ohio changed their lethal injection procedure. They used to give a three drug injection to the veins consisting of thiopental sodium, pancuronium bromide and potassium chloride.The execution team could not find a usable vein in Romell Broom, causing a fiasco at the Lucasville prison,of which I was in attendance. Ohio only administers one drug now according to a press release given by former Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction director, Terry Collins, on November 13, 2009. Mr. Collins stated that Thiopentalsodium alone, applied intravenously with an increase of dosage, 5 times the old dosage amount will be the revised method of lethal injection. He had stated that a back up plan in case a vein site cannot be established or maintained would be the second part of the revision which would include the use of an intramuscular injection of midazolam and hydromorphone.
Has Ohio become A Killing Field?
In September of 09, I, along with my colleague and writing partner, Jon Craig, of the Cincinnati Enquirer, attended a lecture given by Sister Helen PreJean at Xavier University, located in Cincinnati Ohio. Sister Helen is the author of the book entitled Dead Man Walking. An academy award winning movie was made based upon her experiences counseling a death row inmate, his family and the victim's family. The movie starred Susan Sarandon (as Sister Helen) and Sean Penn (the death row inmate she counseled).
In Sister Helen's lecture, she said that Ohio was becoming a killing field. Ohio reenacted the Death Penalty in the year 1974. Since 1999 we have executed 34 men. "When that needle is put in, our hand is on it." she said, emphatically!
Another nun that I met during the failed Romell Broom execution, who was also at Sister Helen's lecture, was Sister Alice Gerdeman. She is a leader of the anti death penalty group called Ohioans to Stop Executions. The group prefers to call themselves "witnesses" instead of protesters. They care deeply for the accused but just as deeply for the families of the victims and the victims themselves. They honor every mans life, good, bad or indifferent. I noticed signs while at the execution that read, "Ted Strickland, (our governor) Don't Kill For Me!" I thought, Hum, I guess he is killing for me. I had never looked at it from that standpoint before and it angered me somewhat. When I did an interview with Governor Strickland in December, on his tough year as governor for Columbus Monthly magazine, I brought up the issue of the death penalty. Governor Strickland once counseled death row inmates as a prison psychologist and is an ordained minister, by the way. He gave me a very somber look, paused as though he were deeply disturbed, and answered me by saying that the issue of the death penalty was something he thought long and hard about in contemplating his decision to run for Governor. It was clear to me, not as a reporter, but as a human being, that Strickland wished he didn't have to make life and death decisions. However, The death penalty IS legal in Ohio and he must follow the law.
- The number of executions in Ohio for 2010 would reach nine before the end of the year, that is if we have no intervention from the courts or the Governor. Ohio has scheduled an execution for each month thru September. They are as follows:
- January 7 - Vernon Smith
- February 4 - Mark Brown
- March 9 - Lawrence Reynolds
- April 20 - Darryl Durr
- May 13 - Michael Beuke
- June 10 - Richard Nields
- July 13 - William Garner
- August 10 - Roderick Davie
- September 15 - Kevin Keith
What is the Cost of the Death Penalty?
In a report from the Death Penalty information Center, they explore and conclude that based upon studies, ending the Death Penalty and having a maximum penalty of a Life Sentence would save states across the country hundreds of millions of dollars per year. The report also gives a national poll of police chiefs in which they rank the death penalty at the bottom of their priorities for achieving a safer society. The officers do not believe the death penalty acts as a deterrent to murder and they rate it as one of the most inefficient uses of taxpayers money in fighting crime. Maintaining a system with 3,300 people on death row is becoming increasingly expensive. California is spending an estimated 137 million dollars per year on the death penalty but hasn't executed anyone in the last three and a half years. Florida is spending an estimated 51 million dollars per year on the death penalty amounting to 24 million dollars for each execution it carries out. Both New York and Jersey have spent well over 100 million dollars on a system that produced no executions. Both have recently stopped the practice. The report further states that the death penalty may serve some politicians as a rhetorical scare tactic but it is not a wise use of scarce criminal justice funding. In 2009, 11 state legislatures considered bills to end capital punishment and its high costs were part of these debates. As the economic crisis continues, it is expected that more states will re examine the costs of having the death penalty. The report emphasises that being "Smart On Crime" means investing in programs that really work. Capital punishment, not being one of them.
For and Against
Support for the death penalty has fluctuated throughout the century. According to Gallup surveys
- In 1936, 61% of Americans favored the death penalty for persons convicted of murder.
- Support reached an all-time low in 1966, 42% were in favor.
- Throughout the 1970's and 80's the percentage of Americans in favor of the death penalty increased steadily. The percentage rate reached 80% in 1994.
- In 2004, a Gallup poll found that a growing number of Americans support life without parole instead of the death penalty for those convicted of murder.
- In 1991, 51% believed the death penalty deterred crime, and 41% believed it did not.
- In 2003, when not offered an alternative sentence, 71% supported the death penalty and 26% opposed it.
In the 1970's, the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) representing over 10 million conservative Christians and 47 denominations were among the Christian groups supporting the death penalty. Today, Fundamentalist and Pentecostal groups favor the death penalty based upon the old testament. The church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints leaves the question of the death penalty for civil law to decide and neither opposes nor promotes it. Although the Roman Catholic Church once supported the death penalty, they now oppose it. Most protestant churches now oppose the death penalty as well. In recent years, and since the appeal from Pope John Paul II to end the death penalty, religious organizations around the nation have issued statements opposing the death penalty.
I have heard many arguments for and against capital punishment. I must say that both sides give convincing reasons for their beliefs. This is no easy issue. The arguments presented to me the most are:
- Innocence- What if the convicted killer is really innocent? The Innocence Project has exonerated many death row inmates with DNA testing.
- The murderer didn't show their victim any mercy, why should we show the murderer any mercy? - In the case of Romell Broom, many were outraged that his attorney, Adele Shank, referred to his treatment during the preparation for execution as "torturous" and "cruel and unusual punishment." This was because he had 18 puncture marks and a red swollen arm due to not being able to find a vein. Several people, including my grandmother, said that they should have put him in front of a firing squad! I'm glad my granny isn't a part of the execution team. She is 80 years old, so give her a break! Attorney's Adele Shank and Tim Sweeney went as far as to file a law suit in federal court, naming the good Governor, the prison director, the execution team, and a few others, as defendants. Mine and Jon's article was named in the lawsuit as evidence because Jon watched as an eyewitness to everything that happend during the failed execution while I stayed outside to interview the protesters.
- We, as a society, should be more evolved in intellect and spirituality than to kill people for any reason.
- Two wrongs don't make a right.
- Death penalty is no deterrent against crime.
- The bible says "Killem".
- Death row prisoners just sit there on death row for 10 to 20 years while we taxpayers house and feed them. The condemned get free medical, dental and vision coverage. Most working taxpayers don't even have health coverage.Too bad the victims can't eat 3 squares and work out all day long in the weight room.
- They should be executed after one month of sentencing, with no appeals.
- Turn the killer over to the victims family, it wont cost the taxpayer a dime!
- An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.
- The mentally ill.- Believe it or not, we have executed some with proven physical mental retardation which is illegal. Check the case files and see just how many have proven, physical brain damage and mental retardation and that are seriously mentally challenged, sitting on death row and that have been executed..
- Race discrimination- Most death row inmates and prison population in general are black and Hispanic men. Anything appear wrong with that picture? Maybe? Just maybe?
- Lack of wealth.- Let's face it, money buys good attorneys and the poor just aren't useful to society all that much, except to do the jobs that rich people don't want to do. Come to think of it, I haven't come across too many rich guys that are sitting on death row.
- Killing the perpetrator doesn't bring back the victim or take the pain away from the victims family.
- Prisons are big business. That is why the condemned sit on death row for so long. Privatization of prisons are a prime example.
Folks, the list goes on and on and on and on. I'm sure that you, yourself, have a valid argument for or against capital punishment and I would love to hear it in the comment section. In conclusion, let us keep in our prayers all who have fell victim to murderous hands and their families.
vote upvote downshareprintflag
- Useful (3)
- Funny
- Awesome (5)
- Beautiful (1)
- Interesting (2)
CommentsLoading...
Your hub is really well done. The death penalty has never been and will never be a deterrent for crime. I doubt that a murderer contemplates any sort of punishment during a crime.
I find it hard to understand why it costs an average of 44 thousand dollars per year per inmate. Many American families live on far less.
The system seems to be stepping up the manufacturing and release of possible violent repeat offenders.
Paul Reid was released from a Texas prison and murdered 7 people in Nashville.
I believe that we have to fix a severely incompetent system that is designed to milk the taxpayers and make no real effort towards rehabilitation.
Usually...if we follow the money trail...we find the problem.
Lisa,
Very well researched, balanced and timely. I hope you get to dig into this topic further. I especially liked the arguments detailed pro- and con. You are obviously passionate about this topic.
fabulous article. I am against the death penalty. Your article really shows all sides and I hope we can rise above an eye for an eye etc. I think life is enough. Killing in an execution is no less inhuman than murder planed and executed or done on the spur of the moment. I think it is horrible. And many innocent people have been executed -- bad lawyers -- good lawyers get people off-- the system really does not work. Great work Lisa. I really respect what you do -- I could not do it.
If only homicidal maniacs had the compassion you do. It only cost so much to have a death penalty because social liberal groups have created this huge delay in the process. I agree with point # 8. There is something wrong with # 12: we have a group of people in this country with pathological problems and it ain't Asians. How many of them are on death row? Could it be that they don't murder much? Or do we just look the other way when Asians murder because we like them better? Actually studies show that families of victims do get satisfaction when the murderer of their loved one is executed and would much more had not 20 years gone by first. I would. If somebody raped, tortured and killed one of my daughters I would not rest until they were executed. The majority of anti-death penalty people don't have children. Having children changes people. Your most troubling point is # 1 and I must say no death penalty without absolute certainty you have the right person.
A powerful article but you know how I feel about this I don't think they should be kept for years.cruel and unusual punishment my butt .I guss what they did to the victims was not cruel.love you your Granny
Get down with your bad self! :D
If the right wing capital punishment enthusiasts were aware that it costs $24 million (Florida) to execute one convicted criminal they might have second thoughts about it. The truth is that capital punishment is barbaric. When society kills the most homicidal maniac it is behaving exactly the same as that homicidal maniac -- and it is teaching our children that it's OK to kill if you have a good reason. Is that what we want to do?
Lets gather up all of the DNA 100% confirmed guilty, who've been tried convicted and sentenced. Let's take these killers somewhere along the Pakistani borders, with instructions to find and kill Bin Laden...and any and all Al-Quida. If they fail they will die at least trying redeem themselves or if they run they will be put in a Pakistani jail which is a much harsher enviornment then here...in the U.S. for life. Then we do not have to execute them or feed and shelter them for the rest of their years. They can serve thier country in a big way, after taking one or more of it's citizens to a far too early grave. That's my solution....an army of killers set loose on an army of killers. I don't think anyone can find fault with that. Those who kill are worthless maggots who deserve nothing less, so let's do it productively. Great hub by the way. ~~MFB III
Hello Lisa! i think the death penalty is much like war. it is sad, that much i can agree with. but, these are not people that got into a fight and shot someone, or pushed someone down and they hit their head and died. no, these are killers! they "plan"to take advantage of and ultimately kill "innocent" and most time unsuspecting people for money or sex!they wanted to cheat, they wanted something at someone elses expense and have killed them for it(bad of itself).
With technology now to help confirm guilt, there should be no innocent people on death row.knowing that,i could not feel good about a person eating three meals a day, playing basketball, making friends having conversations,etc for the rest of their life after cutting someone elses life short. we are all gonna die,it's part of life.it just should not be at the butt end of a senseless crime.so i say the killing is bad,yes it is . . .but they started it! great hub! debate is healthy!
also i failed to mention that death row ...IS... full of non- white people.this shows bias. when two crimes are comitted by a black and a white. the white is offered only life and the black lethal injection. this is bad and should be embarrassing but that is the next hub!
i don't think there ever has been one either. but just this mornng i after having read this hub punched up a case in texas. a guy, it appears that had nothing to do with a case.is on death row , to be executed feb.24. his defense atty. is the x-district attorney and the prosecutor in the case is the defense atty's x-boss.there are no witnesses and no dna was ever requested.there is no motive. one of those law school groups has taken the case. the da is fighting getting dna on the basis that it will upset the victims family and that the test is too expensive.these are the things that we think are impossible and can't happen in this day and age. see , when it happens like his i am against the death penalty.this, not only lacks any form of justice, but is a crime. stay tuned!GREAT HUB!!
As one opposed to the death penalty, I find the sentence "As the economic crisis continues, it is expected that more states will re examine the costs of having the death penalty" shocking. To decide the issue on finacial grounds instead of on grouds of logic and morality, is quite sad. Thank you for this very interesting article.
To James A Watkins, I would say that like him I also have children. However, I do not want them to participate in taking life, even the life of a monster. I understand the human instinct for revenge, but it is a base instinct and it does not mean that I wish to give in to all my base instincts.
Also, instinctual responses can lead to miscarriages of justice, which is a horrendous act for the state to perpetrate, the state which is supposed to protect our safety and our rights. I think that you will agree that such miscarriages are not unknown.
Keep teh monsters in prison in perpertuity. That is true suffering, if it revenge you are looking for.
Lisa, since you are a journalist, may I trouble you to please read my "Allergies or A EULOGY BY THE DECEASED" IF you have time and IF it is not too much trouble and tell me if it raises a smile?
It is OK if you cannot :-)
Lisa, you might find this quote from Volatair useful in your writings on the subject:
It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets.
:-))
If this guy abused an animal, I say FRY HIM! Sorry, but thats just how I feel. Because I feel these people cannot be fixed, there is something very wrong with them, and everyone else pays the price when they go berserk.
The are billions of humans on planet earth, there is no shortage, thats for sure. If you go around hurting or killing humans OR animals, then you do not belong here. Kill and you will be killed, that just the way it is! An eye for an eye! Just make 100 % sure that the person is really guilty before you fire up old sparky!
You have done a great job in researching, keep up the good work.
This is the first hub of yours I've read, and I must say I'm very impressed. I've struggled with this issue for years. I've been into many prisons in WA state helping prisoners get ready to re-enter society. The guys I was working with weren't murderers, but I gained a huge understanding of prison culture. I have gone through periods in my life where I was for the death penalty and against it. I guess you could say I'm still on the fence, but I appreciated this hub a lot, in that it really made me think. You're a very good writer.
We need you hubbing on this topic again, Lisa
Lots going on in Ohio. Another clemency. Gov's campaign. Romell Broom hearing on cruel and unusual punishment.
Funny, MFB III said what I just told my wife last night. LOL I don't know, maybe it's time we became 'civilized' like Europe? I do know it is hard on the executioners. there is an answer somewhere. My sister's sister-in-law was murdered years ago and it was very hard on her family and she left a little girl to be raised by the grandparents. That was in Chillicothe. I know how they all felt.
I feel when you do something so agregous and heinous the only resort is death.. I don't believe you should be able to live off the taxpayers for life and you ran out here and did something horrible. With that said I also believe that if the polce, courts, prosecutors, etc. worked harder to make absolutely certain a person is guilty before bestowing the death penalty innocent folks would not be compromised. The appeals should be limited the only reason they exist is because the legal system is so corrupt and political and so many have been execute because of shotty police work or shotty prosecutors/judges more focused on their career than actual justice. The legal system is set upon clentching a conviction rather than prosecuting and convicting the right person. great hub ty for sharing your view ~hugs~
Yo lisadpreston! You know I'm with you here. Thank you so very much from the bottom of my heart for putting this together. We need more checks and balances for our congress, and injustice system.
I certainly agree with Blackreign about, "The legal system is set upon clenching a conviction rather than prosecuting and convicting the right person." Hallelujah! Amen! Right on! NC, alone, is awash in bad convictions. They do not police their own. America is a corporation. America is the most imprisoned nation on Earth. We need to quit electing lawyers to ANYTHING! The odds on their being a few good ones is absurd. Great write!
Amen sister!
The death penalty is another disgusting stain on America's moral fabric, along with slavery, sexism, lack of universal health care, and marriage equality. Glad journalists like you are writing about this!





















tonymac04 2 years ago
I am against the death penalty for several reasons. I believe it further brutalises an already rather brutal society. It has never been proven to deter anyone from committing a crime - when in England pickpocketing was punishable by public hangings pickpockets would ply their dubious trade among the crowds watching. The Old Testament might have said "an eye for an eye", etc., but Jesus said "judge not." In fact when the woman caught in adultery was about to be stoned (the equivalent of the death penalty) his word were, "Let he who is wihtout sin cast the first stone." How any Christian can support the death penalty is beyond my comprehension. If the "eye for an eye" dictum were followed, as Gandhi said, the world would be populated by blind people.
Finally I think possibly the most telling argument against the death penalty is the possibility of error. Surely society should not entertain for one minute the possibility that an innocent person dies for something they didn't do? And the margin of error might not be huge but it's always there.
Opposing the death penalty does not imply condoning the crime. Because I am against the death penalty does not mean I am for murder. Indeed it's precisely because I'm against murder that I oppose the death penalty. How can we say "do not kill" and then allow the state to kill (in our name, yet)? Will people follow the words or the actions?
Thanks for highlighting an important social issue here and putting so many arguments for and against. As you can see I am not persuaded by the "for" arguments!
Love and peace
Tony